subject
History, 25.06.2020 02:01 alishadautreuil

The Supreme Court’s decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant. must never, even with reasonable cause, carry out a stop and frisk. must always have a warrant to seize evidence, even if it is in plain view. may never violate the Fourth Amendment protections concerning searches and seizures.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:00
Is revlon performing better or worse than it was the previous day? how do you know?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
What was a cause of the boer war? a. conflicts between boers and bantu c. disputes over land ownership b. conflicts over water rights d. desire to control the region's mineral wealth select the best answer from the choices provided a b c d
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:30
Why did metternich think nationalism threatened the austrian empire?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
How and why did the policies of the federal and state governments toward native american people change between 1790 and the 1850s. what were the reaction of native american people to these policies?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The Supreme Court’s decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that...
Questions
question
Geography, 01.09.2019 07:30
question
Physics, 01.09.2019 07:30
Questions on the website: 13722361