2 Points How were mass killings in Bosnia and in Darfur handled differently by the
global community?
A. Aid organizations waited until the violence in Bosnia had ended
before they intervened, but they were more proactive in preventing
violence in Darfur,
B. Violence in the Balkans ended as a result of the unified
intervention of several countries, but in Darfur only the United
States provided military support,
C. NATO countries used military force to end genocide in Bosnia, but
the United Nations did not have the authority to end the violence
in Darfur
D. The United Nations assisted the Bosnian people in solving their
own conflicts, but took a more aggressive and involved approach
in Darfur,

explanation:

there are two statements that are incorrect.

1. the marshall plan was a lend lease program. it was an economic plan that europe redevelop itself after wwii.

2. einstein didn't really do anything to further the allied cause in building the bomb. he merely sent a letter to fdr telling him (in 1939) that if the united states entered the war, perhaps it would be wise to build the bomb before germany did. i would say this answer is incorrect, but when america entered the war 2 years later, fdr thought it might be a good idea to take einstein's advice.

the 4th choice is definitely so wrong that is likely the single answer of this question

answer: me

explanation:

because it’s me

disease was the number one killer of native peoples. they had had little exposure to the diseases of europe. this led to some villages being almost completely wiped out and some tribes destroyed.

the image shown is not a reliable source. it is not a photograph taken of the event, and it is not a painting created by someone who witnessed the event. the image can be considered yellow journalism because it is sensational and exaggerated. the explosion did not likely cause bodies to fly in the air or create a large fireball, as shown here. the image was created to make the american public angry about the explosion, not to show what actually happened.

the painting is not reliable.

the painting is exaggerated.

the painting is inaccurate.

the painting was created to make the public angry, not to show what really happened.