subject
History, 30.06.2020 02:01 aaliyahettorre

When would a secondary source be considered unreliable? O A. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions
O B. When it is written by an academic professional
O C. When it is written by someone who did not experience an event
directly
O D. When it offers a theory about the significance of an event

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
Explain how the roles of both working class and middle and upper class women changed during the industrial revolution. how did those changes lead to the women’s rights and suffrage movements?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
What was the importance of latin during the scientific revolution in europe? it encouraged people to join the roman catholic church. it was the language used to celebrate the roman catholic mass. it provided a common language for the exchange of ideas. it was one of many languages used to share new ideas.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
This was the selling of large tracts of georgia land along a river in present-day mississippi from 1795 to 1803 at extremely low prices by georgia governors and the state legislature.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:10
The author of the article, arthur brooks, has been president of the american enterprise institute since 2009, an organization committed to protecting free enterprise in the united states.he is the author of several books, including "the road to freedom: how to win the fight for free enterprise."
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
When would a secondary source be considered unreliable? O A. When it omits information that contrad...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 21.02.2021 08:30
question
Mathematics, 21.02.2021 08:30
question
Chemistry, 21.02.2021 08:30
Questions on the website: 13722367