Is it preferable for the U. S. government to have unified party control or divided government? Why?

Explanation:

It is preferable for the U.S. government to have a unified party control in order to avoid conflict. There should be diversity in the way individual members think, yes, but a divided government has a higher probability of causing big group disputes and those never lead anywhere good. With one unified party, members will have similar beliefs and goals for the country, which will allow for a better, more efficient government and running of the country.

i am pretty sure the awsers is d.

d) eastern business owners and former federalists