subject
History, 23.07.2020 06:01 kukisbae

What resulted from the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)?? A) Criminal defendants who could not afford an attorney had to be provided with one for free.

B) People who were being arrested had to be informed of their Constitutional rights.

C) Prosecutors could no longer engage in plea bargaining with defense attorneys.

D) Evidence obtained in an unconstitutional manner could not be used in court.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 15:20
How did nationalism aid napoleon’s rise to power in france? his new continental system expanded trade with britain, making the french proud of their prosperity and his rule. his extension of the french revolution’s social reforms promoted france’s cultural image and his power. his military victories greatly activated french national pride and won him continuing popular approval. his support of women’s rights in the napoleonic code made french women proud of their nation and its leader.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Who were the people that migrated south into india and indus valley
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:10
Which of the following economic terms describes an increase in product price without the increase of money's worth?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 13:30
The world war ii strategy used by the us for attacking japan was called
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
What resulted from the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)?? A) Criminal defendants...
Questions
question
English, 22.01.2021 19:20
question
Biology, 22.01.2021 19:20
Questions on the website: 13722367