HELP HELP BRAINLIEST "War between Saddam Hussein and Ayatollah Khomeini was inevitable." To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

I personally agree with this statement.

Explanation:

I mean in hindsight, you'll start to understand why it was inevitable. Iraq was ultimately winning, with the support of the US and Britain; giving the Iraq firearms (technology that was far powerful than Iraq's past weapons), money (to help support any financial aid/problem that Iraq may possibly encounter), and much more. I mean with this arsenal of reinforcements and supplies handed over to Iraq, they were obviously going to fight based on all the trouble the superpowers (the US and Britain) gave.

I hope this helps you!

the answer is: the sesquicentennial of the american civil war is an occasion to consider the legacy of that great conflict. this legacy is our inheritance, and despite many indelible features, we continue to negotiate the resolution of that conflict. the civil war was fought over slavery, but not always on behalf of slaves

- "schenck v. united states, case in which the u.s. supreme court ruled on march 3, 1919, that the freedom of speech protection afforded in the u.s. constitution's first amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented to society a “clear and present danger.” "

- speech aimed to potentially create danger could be banned.

< 3