Modern debate on the role of the president reflects varied perspectives and uses current events to argue for a more limited to a more expansive use of executive power. Articulate a defensible claim or thesis on whether presidents are justified in their use of formal and informal powers to meet the needs of the role of the office. Can Anyone help me write a thesis for this using a current news event?

Explain in the simplest form what laissez faire is

Japan became a peaceful democratic nation relativlt quickly after the end of world war 2. which step was not part of its post-war transformation? a. giving the emperor more political power.b. adopting a new constitution.c. giving women the right to vote.d. disarming most of the military.

During andrew johnson’s presidency, the radical republicans gained control over policymaking in congress. they had enough power to override any presidential veto. how did the radical republicans use this opportunity? a. they blocked johnson’s weak reconstruction policies by taking charge of the reconstruction plan. b. they extended their support to johnson’s policies for reconstruction of the south. c. they removed johnson from office and took over the task of reconstructing the south. d. they removed all former confederates from office and stopped the south from rejoining the union.