what are the pros and cons of loose constructionism, and the pros and cons of Originalism

Explanation:

Originalism prevents judges from gaining unfettered discretion to inject their personal values into a written constitution.

Originalism helps ensure predictability and protects against arbitrary changes in the interpreted meaning of a constitution; to reject originalism inplicitly repudiates stare decisis.

If the Constitution as interpreted can truly be changed at the decree of a judge, then "The Constitution ... is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary which they may twist and shape into any form they please."

where is the cartoon dude

yes they have. but is this a true false question? if it is, the answer is true.