On which fact does the historical perspective of the two passages differ?

the cause of Otzi's death

Explanation:

We note in the first passage that there's a brief description of the Killer, at least mention was made of the killer thereby giving the reader a sense of what caused Otzi"s death.

However, the second passage uses indirect language to describe not the killer but the sufferings of Otzi, thereby creating a difference in historical perspective on the cause of Otzi's death.

well this is going to be a long answer lol ok so the visigoths were a branch of the goths who frequently raided rome, uh the hunas attacked the guptas a lot and weakened them, uuhm of course the romans used math and science in there every day lives i mean they had a whole empire to run, and rome was split into east and west by a general named diocletian. hope this you! : )

mustafa ataturk thought nationalism in turkey would best be achieved by modernizing the country.