subject
History, 28.08.2020 06:01 sethjohnson386pbnm3x

In Tinker v. Des Moines, why did the Supreme Court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands? O Their action did not negatively influence other students.
Their action was not disruptive.
Their action occurred off school grounds.
* Their action was political speech.

THE ANSWER IS B, ALL OF THE OTHER ANSWERS THAT THEY SAY IT IS D THEY ARE WRONG, hope this helps :)

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 00:10
What does it mean in the declaration of independence for cutting off our trade with all parts of the world
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
Define the word imperialism. what is your opinion: should the u.s. engage in imperialism? under what circumstances? offer a brief, effective argument against the opinion that you hold.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
The massacre at sand creek was an attack by a colorado militia on peaceful american indians. a colorado militia on a group of dakota warriors. american indians on peaceful white settlers. federal soldiers on a group of cheyenne warriors.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:00
Why did president wilson want the us to provide leadership at the end of wwi
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In Tinker v. Des Moines, why did the Supreme Court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands?...
Questions
question
Health, 08.01.2020 00:31
question
Social Studies, 08.01.2020 00:31
question
Mathematics, 08.01.2020 00:31
question
Mathematics, 08.01.2020 00:31
Questions on the website: 13722362