The Pueblo Revolt of 1680, also known as Pope's Rebellion, may be most closely compared to
political revolutions by European-ruled colonies,
such as America and India, for the right to self
governance.
O the revolution of the American colonists who did not
want taxation without representation.
strikes by workers protesting unsafe working
conditions and low wages, such as those during the
American Progressive Era.
O revolts by African enslaved persons against
plantation owners in Brazil and Hispaniola for
freedom from slavery and cultural oppression.

Revolts by African enslaved persons against  plantation owners in Brazil and Hispaniola for  freedom from slavery and cultural oppression.

Explanation:

The Pueblo Revolt of 1680 was a conflict between the natives of the Pueblo tribes and the Spanish colonizers. Although the relationship between the pueblos and the Spaniards was established in friendly terms, in the beginning, the Spaniards soon began to exploit the pueblos, devalue them and cause a strong cultural repression, forbidding their traditions and severely punishing them for disobedience.

This conflict is very similar to the African slave revolts against plantation owners in Brazil and Hispaniola, which were caused by the forced suppression of culture that the slaves cherished.

fgfg

explanation:

gfg

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is