What are two ways the Bill of Rights opposes the idea of the divine right of kings? It established that religion had no relevance to the monarch's role. It stated that the English monarchy was a position that Parliament delegated. It stated that the monarch's power was subject to limits set by Parliament. It established that the people of England had the right to choose the monarch. It abolished the role of the monarch as the head of the Church of England.

It stated that the English monarchy was a position that Parliament delegated and It stated that the monarch's power was subject to limits set by Parliament

Explanation:

PLATO test

It stated that the English monarchy was a position that Parliament delegated.

It stated that the monarch's power was subject to limits set by Parliament.

Explanation:

The Bil of Rights were good for some people. The New constitution had just came out and the Democrats thought it gave the government too much power and I guess they   didnt think they got much power from it. So, the bill of rights came out to state that everyone has their natural rights

this is not a question its simply asking you to read and write a few sentences and   the question on the bottom its fairly easy, you can do this!

d) in the state of iowa