Spanish colonization in Latin America areas which today are Mexico and Peru marked a significant turning point for native cultures in those areas. Briefly explain things that dramatically

changed, but also explain those things that stayed the same before and after colonization for

native peoples.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

One of the things that dramatically changed was the conception of spirituality that Native Mesoamerican and Southamerican had regarding God or religion.

One of the first things Spaniard frays did was to evangelize Native Indians into Catholicism. For this to happen, Spaniards face strong opposition from Natives who truly believed in their many gods and deities. It really was a struggle for Spaniards to change their mentality. They even had to destroy Native Indian's temples but had to build churches in the same place to make Indians attend religious ceremonies and religious teachings.

Paradoxically, one thing that stayed the same before and after colonization for native peoples was their love for mother nature. Indians still believed in their deities and in the love and respect they had for mother nature. Even in modern-day Mexico and Peru, there are plenty of people that believe in taking care of nature and use herbs and plant formulas as medicines. Homeopathy is very important in Mexico. And in both countries, Indigenous ceremonies are still performed in most of the towns.

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

is this a question? put a question ?