Choose the correct example of a historical allusion. "Much laughter has been indulged in at my expense for having told the Congress audience at Calcutta that if there was sufficient

response to my programme of non-co-operation Swaraj would be attained in one year."

"Let us not mistake reformed councils, more lawcourts and even governorships for real freedom or power. They are but subtler

methods of emasculation."

"The Germans were defeated not because they were necessarily in the wrong, but because the allied Powers were found to possess

greater brute strength."

"My proposition however is based on a mathematical calculation. And I venture to say that true Swaraj is a practical impossibility

without due fulfilment of my conditions."

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!