subject
History, 29.09.2020 20:01 julio003620

Based on Source A, explain how land, trade, and migration were sources of conflict between the colonists and Native Americans during the French and Indian War? Source A: Unit 1 Skill Source A
The British victory opened new territory for exploration and expansion, but it also brought the
responsibility for overseeing three troublesome groups. The first were thousands of resentful
former French subjects. French settlements remained in Canada…To keep the settlements
under control the British maintained a close watch and employed harsh tactics to quell
rebellion.
France’s Native American allies were Britain’s second problem. With Britain’s victory in the
French and Indian War, the Indian supporters of the French were now in a precarious position.
The French were no longer able to back their Indian allies, which left tribes such as the Huron
out of an increasingly British-dominated power and trade network. While the French tended to
develop trade and mission connections with local tribes, the British colonial authorities were
much more inclined to remove indigenous peoples altogether and clear the land for white
settlement. Some tribes feared that the arrival of British colonists would result in their eventual
removal from their lands.
With the colonists marching onto his people’s land, Chief Pontiac of the Algonquian-speaking
Ottawa tribe led a bloody rebellion that resulted in the death of thousands of soldiers and
settlers. The British regained the upper hand, but nonetheless realized the need to live
peacefully with the Indians to prevent further turmoil.
The third troublesome group was, ironically, the British colonists, who were beginning to test
the boundaries of Britain’s rule and were becoming increasingly aggressive toward the natives.
To maintain the situation until a peaceful resolution could be reached, London’s government
issued the Proclamation of 1763, which called for a halt to westward expansion beyond the
Appalachians. First, the Britons hoped to keep the colonists tied more closely to English colonial
authorities by confining them to the coast. Second, the War had put England in dire financial
straits, and keeping colonists east of the Appalachians would facilitate the collection of taxes
and allow England to refill its treasuries.
The Proclamation of 1763 enraged the colonists, who felt they had earned the right to
expansion by risking their lives in settling in North America. They openly defied British rule and
rushed westward, creating new settlements, facing new challenges, and becoming more selfreliant. Colonists in New England also resented having to quarter British troops in their homes
during the war. Moreover, Britain’s attempts to tax the colonists to pay for Britain’s wartime
support angered the colonists.
In addition, Britain’s authoritarian rule over Canada brought deep concerns to the settlers. The
loss of liberties in Canada, such as the right to trial by jury, raised fears among colonists that the
Crown might impose a similar rule in New England.
To the colonists the war was one of the first signs that they were not just transplanted
Englishmen. They were a society with their own traditions, customs, and identity that was
increasingly distinct from the mother country. They also had realized they had the resources to
handle some of their own affairs without looking to Britain for support. At one time, the British
government was an important source of support and protection for the colonies. Increasingly,
the British government was perceived as a nuisance whose demands for taxes became symbolic
of an increasingly irrelevant colonial authority.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:50
Ahistorian is writing a book about british prime minister winston churchill. she claims that churchill was one of the earliest british leaders to realize that nazi germany was a serious threat to british security what is the best way to determine whether the historian's interpretation is valid? o a. review primary sources to see if churchill ever recorded his opinions of nazi germany. o b. find out whether the historian has written any other books about british leaders. c. analyze secondary sources summarizing the effects of nazi germany on great britain. o d. cite the historian's book in another study about important 20th- century world leaders.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:00
What are contributions made by francis bacon
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:30
Europe and asia are divided by a. the alps c. the pyrennes b. the northern european plain d. the ural mountains select the best answer from the choices provided a b c d
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
List two reason that james k.polk gives for supporting the annexation of texas
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Based on Source A, explain how land, trade, and migration were sources of conflict between the colon...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 21.10.2020 06:01
question
Mathematics, 21.10.2020 06:01
question
Biology, 21.10.2020 06:01
Questions on the website: 13722360