Scenario: The President appoints the heads of the government departments. If the Senate disapproves of his nominee for certain roles it does not matter because the Presidents’ administrative role will overpower the Senate. Is this Constitutional?

(a lot of reading)

Explanation:

Americans tend to think of their president as the most powerful person in the world, but the Constitution limits the power of all three branches of government—the president as well as the Congress and the federal courts.

In the case of filling top positions in the executive and judicial branches, the Constitution divides responsibility between the president and the Senate. Article II, Section 2 empowers the president to nominate and—“by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate”—to appoint principal officers such as department heads as well as subordinate ones such as deputies.

The process of the president’s nomination of Cabinet secretaries, and the Senate’s confirmation of them, is perhaps best known to the public but still somewhat mysterious.

answer; i believe the answer is (mesopotamia); modern day

it is the code of hammurabi