The Compromise of 1850 sought to settle the question of whether newly acquired territory from Mexico would allow slavery. Consider the maps in the Compromise of 1850 section. California was admitted into the nation as a slave-free state. The Utah and New Mexico territories would allow slavery and would later be able to vote on the slavery issue themselves. Why could Southern politicians be considered over-optimistic in accepting this deal? What might they have been hoping for in the future if they supported the spread of slavery?

They guaranteed a large free-state like California while letting the territories vote for themselves.

They hoped the territories would vote to allow slavery.

They hoped that if the territories voted to allow slavery they would hold a large population and multiple states—the territories made up more land than California.

This is the right answer I just took the quiz

china is shifting toward specialization in industry and services and away from agriculture.

explanation:

mark brainliest

answer: ensure protection from communism

explanation:

the north atlantic treaty was largely dormant until the korean war initiated the establishment of nato to implement it, by means of an integrated military structure: this included the formation of supreme headquarters allied powers europe in 1951, which adopted the western union's military structures and plans.