HELPPP PLEASE!! How did Classical, Byzantine, Islamic, and
Western European culture influence Renaissance arts?
Architecture:
Literature:

Yes

Explanation:

Classical influence:

The Renaissance was a time when people often turned to Greek and Roman influence for there artwork like sculptures, and paintings, which is why classical art is often confused with renaissance art.

Byzantine influence:

The Byzantine empire was very popular during the renaissance in it's literature and art due to its part in forming the Christian orthodoxy. The Byzantine empire's influence can be seen during the renaissance throughout the art work and literature about God and other religious figures.

Islamic influence:

The Islamic people had preserved and translated many ancient texts that would later go on to inspire the Renaissance thinkers, as well spreading this knowledge throughout places like Hispania and Sicily, which were conquered by Islamic armies.

Western Influence:

The western influence is probably the biggest of these choices during the renaissance due to the new way of thinking introduced, the doubt of religious beliefs, exploration, and invention during this period. The Western influence encouraged new ways of thinking leading to new ideas and inventions that some can be seen as the base of modern day inventions.

could you use this to with a topic?

the key difference between a democracy and a republic lies in the limits placed on government by the law, which has implications for minority rights. both forms of government tend to use a representational system — i.e., citizens vote to elect politicians to represent their interests and form the government.

b) a state law could be declared illegal if it contradicted the constitution.

explanation:

the conflict of this case originated when james w. mcculloch, a cashier of the baltimore branch of the second bank of the united states that the congress had chartered in 1816, refused to pay a tax imposed by the maryland state.

in the case, the state of maryland appealed that the establishment of a second bank was unconstitutional since the constitution didn't say anything about granting that power to congress. however, the case determined that even if such right wasn't specifically stated in the constitution, it was part of the "implied powers" of the government enunciated in article i, section 8.

the case also eliminated maryland's legislation to impose taxes to a national bank, asserting that even though the states retained the power of taxation, the constitution's laws are supreme and can not be controlled by the states, therefore, if a state law contradicts the constitution, it should be declared illegal.

explanation: