Contrast the Massachusetts Body of Liberties to the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut.

Massachusetts Body of Liberties included a set of Liberties that every citizen could enjoy under the General Court.

Fundamental Orders of Connecticut included 11 orders or laws and a preamble that rendered the General Court as supreme.

Explanation:

The Massachusetts Body of Liberties and the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut were both legal frameworks established by the citizens of colonies for administrative purposes. The major difference between the two frameworks is that the Massachusetts Body of Liberties included a set of Liberties that every citizen could enjoy under the General Court. In other words, it included liberties and rights of the people as citizens of the colony.

On the other hand, the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut included 11 specific orders or laws and a preamble which provided the General Court with executive, judicial and legislative authority. It made the General Court the most supreme authority of the colony.

both are true, the congress does have the power to create banks, even if this power is not specifically described in the constitution, since there is nothing restricting it and there is power given to the congress to make "all laws which shall be necessary and proper". maryland was not allowed to tax a branch of the national bank operating there, and the supreme court decided that no state could. both of these topics were discussed in a decision of the mcculloch v. maryland case in 1819.

“a committee reviews the bill and marks it up to make it more viable and to reflect interests