What would be one colonial advantage to referring to this event as “The Bloody Massacre? (In other words, how could this incident benefit the colonists by referring to it as a bloody massacre?) a. in order to gain support for the British king
b. in order to give the colonists a common cause against Britain, and separate from it
c. in order to blame colonists for the event
d. in order to make Bostonians seem weak

c holding free elections

the answer is a or the 1st option:  

the heads of the inquisition felt it was offensive, unfocused, and blasphemous.

can i have brainliest answer

bloodiest single day of war   |   gettysburg

where the civil war ends for good   | appomattox court house

the first major land battle; south wins | bull run/manassas (va)

gives union control of the mississippi river |   vicksburg

lee’s first tactical defeat; big win for union |   fort sumter1

with lincoln's re-election |   atlanta

south wins

splits confederacy in two for the duration of the war,

antietam