For either Mapp v. Ohio or Miranda v. Arizona, describe the constitutional issue of the case, and explain how the court's ruling protects those accused of a crime.

Could you please explain the question better

Explanation:

What you said

For either Mapp v. Ohio or Miranda v. Arizona, describe the constitutional issue of the case, and explain how the court's ruling protects those accused of a crime.

hello there, can you add the "following" multiple choices