How was the nootka sound controversy settled? A. Both Countries agreed to allow the other to operate in the region, but at a distance.
B. Both countries were banned from further exploration in the region and were forced to look elsewhere for expansion.
C. Both countries were prohibited from establishing any more settlements in the region, but existing settlements could remain.
D. both countries were prohibited from trading goods or services with the natives in the region.

d

explanation:

i think that this is the best answer, but im sorry if this is wrong

explanation:

ur mom was made

several states had passed similar laws, but they were limited to intrastate businesses. the sherman antitrust act was based on the constitutional power of congress to regulate interstate commerce.

you answered my friends question just to get the coins you didn't even give a valid response.

both are true, the congress does have the power to create banks, even if this power is not specifically described in the constitution, since there is nothing restricting it and there is power given to the congress to make "all laws which shall be necessary and proper". maryland was not allowed to tax a branch of the national bank operating there, and the supreme court decided that no state could. both of these topics were discussed in a decision of the mcculloch v. maryland case in 1819.