How did the "rule of reason," supported by William Howard Taft, differ from Theodore Roosevelt's New Nationalism? The New Nationalism would seek government control over telephone and telegraph rates while the "rule of reason" would not.
The New Nationalism would back stronger government power to bust trusts while the "rule of reason" would weaken that power.
The New Nationalism would weaken the hard line set by the Sherman Antitrust Act while the "rule of reason" would strengthen it.
The New Nationalism would allow trusts to squeeze out smaller businesses while the "rule of thumb" would not.

According to article 2, what was george washington's major concern about the rebellion in massachusetts?

How did the united states’ approach regarding the japanese economy shift during the korean war? it focused on growth rather than reform. it focused on reform rather than growth. it focused on reform rather than stabilization. it focused on stabilization rather than decline.

Instead of being thirteen republics, under a federal head, [the federalists’ plan] is clearly designed to make us one [unified] government. . whether such a change can ever be [made] in any manner; whether it can be [made] without convulsions and civil wars; whether such a change will not totally destroy the liberties of this country—time only can determine. –the federal farmer what best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses? in time, one unified government will run the country. the federalists prefer thirteen republics to one unified government. one unified government probably will not lead to disruptions and civil wars. under one unified government, people will be robbed of their freedoms.