In this discussion, you will submit your three-paragraph judicial opinion on your chosen hypothetical case. Post a detailed response to the discussion prompt. Then comment on at least two other posts.
Reference lesson content for the details you should include in your post and comments.
To understand how you will be graded for this assessment, read the Discussion Guidelines and Rubric.

A woman is found dead in her apartment. There is no evidence of extensive trauma to the body. She shows no entry or exit wound from a bullet on her body, ruling out the potential of a shooting. There are no lacerations on her body, no defense wounds, and no ligature marks, which ruled out a fight or being bound. She was not stabbed nor was she raped. Her body is cold and stiff, implying that livor, rigor, and algor mortis has set in. The medical examiner estimates the victim has been dead between 2-3 days. After running a toxicology exam, she’s found to have Xanax, alcohol, and marijuana in her system. She did not have a prescription to Xanax and was not known to smoke marijuana. There are three potential suspects that are brought to court.

The first is the woman’s roommate. The second is the woman’s partner. The third is her jealous ex. The roommate has a prescription to Xanax and is known to smoke marijuana, but could not have done it because they were not in town at the time of the murder. The partner was supposed to come over, but was unable to because they were visiting their sick grandmother. The ex had motive and no alibi, but they could not match any potential DNA evidence to them.

After deliberation, the jury comes to a decision. They believe the partner was responsible for it. The roommate had a solid alibi. The ex had no ties to the crime scene. The partner had access to the Xanax, alcohol, and marijuana in the apartment, their alibi fell through as death records proved that their grandmother had died the night before, and they had motive after finding out that the victim was cheating on them with their ex. The judge agrees on the verdict on the grounds of alibi, evidence, motivation, and expert testimony. The partner is convicted of premeditated homicide and homicide in the first degree.

Explanation:

answer: ensure protection from communism

explanation:

the north atlantic treaty was largely dormant until the korean war initiated the establishment of nato to implement it, by means of an integrated military structure: this included the formation of supreme headquarters allied powers europe in 1951, which adopted the western union's military structures and plans.

this is a good question! i'll do some research and come back when i have the answer!