Your friend is worried about the growing power of military men in Rome government some others senators want to take Violent actions to stop generals from taking over as dictators your friend wants your advice is violent justified to save the Roman republic

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

In the context of the Roman Republic times, my advice would be to appeal to Roman law. Romans had clear legislation to resolve these disputes. However, those also were violent times when unfortunately for Romans, powerful military groups ambitioned more power and control of Rome.

My advice to my friend would be that unfortunately, violence is justified to save the Roman Republic, although this never has resolved any issue. Violence breeds more violence, and sooner or later, revenge is the name of the game. It is a vicious circle in which victim and perpetrator change roles, but there is never a winner. Violence never has been the option.

when studying cause and effect, historians usually group the causes into different categories. for example, cultural causes reflect how a society’s literature and art convey the way the society saw itself in relation to the rest of the world. another resource that historians use to understand society is pop culture, which tells them the trends and ideas that are preferred by the common people. when studying cause and effect, it’s important to remember multiple causation, or the idea that an effect could have several causes and vice versa.  

the correct option is “cultural causes” since art and literature are related to the culture of a place. culture is determined by literature, art, music.

the correct option is “pop culture” since it reflects the likes and ideas of common people whereas the rest of the options do not focus on common people.  

the correct option is “multiple causation” since it refers to the idea that events are caused by multiple reasons, not just a single one.  

not sure but thinking i'ts cause the government was broke. not sure