Which best compares the Patricians and the Plebeians in Roman society and the
economy?

Hello. You did not put the answer options, but we can say that the best comparison between patricians and commoners is that patricians belonged to the nobility and had political, economic and social rights. The commoners, on the contrary, were not part of the nobility, nor did they have any kind of rights.

Explanation:

The Roman population was composed of commoners and patricians, who had many differences between them. The patricians were noble, owned land and were the true holders of the region's political power. They had full access to education and were considered superiors with all the privileges that the empire could offer. In addition, they were the sole holders of political, economic and social rights. Unlike the commoners, who were servants and had no political, economic or social privileges for a long time.

it refers to race, i am pretty sure this was a popular term in nazi germany or something.