Did the “Great Upheaval” do more good or bad for organized labor?

Great Upheaval do more good for organized labor.

Explanation:

The great upheaval was a protest that conducted by the workers of Baltimore and Ohio railroad company after they  unfairly receive a pay cut for the second time in less than a year. The workers filled the transition and prevented the use of railroads until their demands were addressed. The protest ended after the feds sent the national troops to disperse the crowd.

On hindsight,  this might be seen as a failure for the movement. But from that point onward, a lot more people start to pay attention to worker's right and standard living wages. I believe this why Great Upheaval  essentially do more good for organized labor.

i do not know if this question has options, but a main impact of the federal reserve act of 1913, which created the federal reserve bank, was the international use of the u.s. dollar, which soon became the world's leading currency - particularly during world war i, since many nations around the world asked the united states for money.

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.