According to the text, what was the main argument against the tax?
It was too high and would place an unfair
burden on the people.
It was not enough to meet the payments on
the debt.
To save American credit from destruction, it
was at least necessary that the interest on the
public debt should be paid. For this purpose
Congress in 1781 asked permission to levy a
five per cent. duty on imports. The modest
request was the signal for a year of angry
discussion. Donkeys fond of reasoning from
analogy asked, If taxes could thus bellevied
by any power outside the State, why had we
ever opposed the Stamp Act or the tea duties?

The national government should not have the
power to levy taxes on the citizens.

yesanswer:

explanation:

wilsons 14 points

hope i

i believe it would influence their own way of understanding things. it shall be a foundation where they can draw or start an argument.   historians are also  scientists that  have their tools of analysis and expertise to unlock a variety of difficulties such as relationships of man, origin, politics, economy, and culture. based on facts and understanding on these areas, they may shade light to extract ideas and develop options to validate a hypothesis or debunk it.

the flooding of the nile was not a perfect occurrence. this gave rise to the belief in the gods and a highly stratified social structure. at the top of the social structure were gods such as ra and osiris because the egyptians believed that they controlled the universe. the egyptians tried their best to the gods because if they were happy, then the nile would flood producing an abundance of crops and preventing famine. after the gods came the pharaohs in social status. the egyptian people believed the pharaoh to be a god in mortal form. they had absolute power over the dominion which required protection through the of government officials and soldiers. the rest of the people’s status went in the order of scribes, merchants, artisans, farmers, and finally slaves.