The video "What is History For?" argues that history matters because it provides solutions to the problems of the present. Recall the statement "Those who don't know history won't be able to improve the present." Consider a recent event, either in your personal life or in the news. In a few sentences, describe a way that a past historical event could inform your understanding of the recent event. Briefly describe a strategy for how you could be conscious of presentism the use of modern values to interpret past events in the study of those past events.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The recent event I choose is the present political campaigns and the 2020 presidential election.

The past historical event for reference is the US presidential election of 2016. In that elections, so much was said and done about the problems in US politics and how both candidates attack each other, instead of proposing clear arguments and strategies to improve the citizen's conditions in many important areas such as health services, the creation of jobs, internal debt, environment conservation, immigration, crime, among many others.

Unfortunately,  four years later, we are witnessing exactly the same behaviors, public conducts, lack of high-level debates, and probably accusations and critiques ar worse this time than four years ago.

My strategy to use modern values to present past events is to invite the American audience to take a serious evaluation of how politics is at its worse level of all times. There are no proposals, just accusations. There is no respect, just aggression. There is no sense of unity, just division. And the extreme visions are polarizing even more.  My invitation would be to acknowledge the present situation, knowing that in the past, people have only been a passive witness when their participation is much needed. Not only in the election but closely following the political and economic life of America and the decisions of the representatives.

its perfect how it was

the committees of correspondence were the american colonies’ means for maintaining communication lines in the years before the revolutionary war. in 1764, boston formed the earliest committee of correspondence to encourage opposition to britain’s stiffening of customs enforcement and prohibition of american paper money. the following year, new york formed a similar committee to keep the other colonies notified of its actions in resisting the stamp act. in 1773, the virginia house of burgesses proposed that each colonial legislature appoint a committee for intercolonial correspondence. the exchanges that followed built solidarity during the turbulent times and bring about the formation of the first continental congress in 1774.