I need a paragraph of this due by tomorrow morning: what are the major differences and similarities between the Limited Monarchy of England and the Absolute Monarchies across the rest of Europe? What gives these Monarchies their authority to rule over their inhabitants?

Absolute monarchy (or absolutism as doctrine) is a form of monarchy in which the monarch holds supreme autocratic authority, principally not being restricted by written laws, legislature, or customs. These are often hereditary monarchies. In contrast, in constitutional monarchies, the head of state's authority derives ... In the Ottoman Empire, many sultans wielded

Explanation:

WAIT-.. i don't think you will need this and i do not think this is what you need, but it is the only results i could find searching it up and looking for the information. again, sorry and i hope this helps

In an absolute monarchy, the monarch holds the supreme or absolute powers, whereas in the constitutional monarchy, the head of state is a hereditary or elected monarch. The difference between an absolute monarchy and a constitutional monarchy is that in an absolute monarchy the monarch has total control over the country whilst in a constitutional monarchy they do not. In an absolute monarchy, the king or queen makes every important decision within the country and has the final say in the affairs of taxation, war, domestic affairs, borders, and legislation. In a constitutional monarchy, however, a monarch must get approval from a parliament or government body in order to enact their policies. During this period, parliaments usually controlled tax policy and the financial affairs of the country and had the ability to restrict the abilities of a king or queen.

Under an absolute monarchy, the people were subject to the will and desires of one individual, and their needs and wants were often ignored or disregarded. Under a constitutional monarchy, however, the population had much more protection from the policies of a monarch and had more of a say in the affairs of the state both internally and externally.

peace keepers

idealism to be spread

riches kept

thurgood marshall

explanation: in 1954, thurgood marshall and a team of naacp attorneys won brown v. board of education of topeka, kansas. in this landmark decision, the supreme court held that segregation in public education violated the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment.