subject
History, 06.11.2020 08:00 lamooothegoat

What was the decision in Baker v. Carr (1962)? A-The Congress cannot use the necessary and proper clause to justify interfering with a state's own laws.

B-The courts have some jurisdiction over legislative redistricting disputes.

C-The Supreme Court can decide if the actions of the other branches of government are
unconstitutional

D-Redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 15:20
Which option best summarizes what is expected of citizens in a domocracy?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:00
The constitution protects the rights of citizens by limiting the power of government
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:30
Which phrase describes one of the reforms the national convention made up to improve the lives of ordinary french people
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
Both the nervous and endocrine systems send electrical and chemical signals for internal communication. select the best answer from the choices provided t f
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
What was the decision in Baker v. Carr (1962)? A-The Congress cannot use the necessary and proper c...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 03.08.2021 20:20
Questions on the website: 13722363