subject
History, 08.11.2020 09:30 pollywallythecat

What did Dred Scott argue in the Scott v. Sandford case? O He was free because he had lived in free states.
O He was free because he was now a slaveholder.
O He should not have been captured because he was a fugitive.
O He should get his property back through due process.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
What is this is a type of criminal charge that, while illegal is generally considered less serious. these can include things like trespassing, public indoxication, and vandalism.
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
Which factor best suggests a cause for the urban problems shown in this table? (3 points) increasing discriminatory housing practices shifting population density gradients over time declining urban renewal efforts by city governments declining basic employment sector in industrial cities increasing gentrification efforts in the inner cities
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Which of the following would an isolationist support?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:20
Why did the mujahedeen receive us support even though they were against some american ideals
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
What did Dred Scott argue in the Scott v. Sandford case? O He was free because he had lived in free...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 02.02.2021 17:40
question
Mathematics, 02.02.2021 17:40
question
Mathematics, 02.02.2021 17:40
question
Mathematics, 02.02.2021 17:40
question
Physics, 02.02.2021 17:40
Questions on the website: 13722367