Do you agree with the flims argument that the junk food industry should be regulated the same way that the tobacco industry is being regulated? Why or why not?

I agree with the argument.

Explanation:

Junk foods are foods that, when eaten in large quantities and very often, can be extremely harmful to the body, causing serious health problems and even death.

As we know, our country is a big consumer of junk food and suffers from the results of this type of food. Just like cigarettes, medicines and other elements, junk food can be addictive and make someone dependent on it. For this reason, it is correct to say that the junk food industry should be regulated, as cigarettes are, for example.

These regulations should not only be established to limit the consumption of these foods, but also in the manufacture of them, promoting less harmful products.

the menu would be considered a problem for students who have food allergies.

hope this : )

no it wouldn't because yellow journalism would exaggerate in everything.