How did the Indian Reorganization Act improve the life of Native Americans

it provided the return of surplus lands to the tribes rather than to homesteaders. It encouraged written constitutions and charters giving Indians the power to manage their internal occurrences

In contrast to the horrific Indian Removal Act, the Indian Reorganization Act and the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act aimed to correct many of the mistakes made during the nineteenth century. The Indian Reorganization Act passed in 1934 and gave Native Americans the right to open businesses and created a system through which Native Americans could have access to vocational training and credit. The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act was even bigger, as it granted tribes the right to govern their own territory (limited tribal sovereignty) while still giving them access to federal money.

Explanation:

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is