How could the Mexican Government and Texans have compromised to prevent a rebellion or was compromise an impossibility? Explain in 5 sentences or more.

The answer is below

Explanation:

Both the Mexican Government and Texans could have had more negotiations and reach an agreement through a series of dialogues between the two.

However, giving the circumstances that caused the rebellion, the compromise between the two appears impossible.

Similar to the American civil war, the issue of slavery is one abolition is one of the major causes of the Texan's rebellion.

Governmental differences with the issuance of Siete Leyes by the Mexican government and refusal of Texans to acknowledge can be considered treason and the result is a punishment from the government or ultimately war.

cultural differences or religious differences are also one of the main factors, and as it can be seen in the middle east or Palestine vs Israel, the conflict can be endless, and will ultimately result in war.

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.

according to worldatlas.com, the u.s. has an 86% literacy rate.