How did the Stamp Act differ from the Intolerable Acts? The Stamp Act resulted in anger from the settlers, whereas the Intolerable Acts resulted in contentment from the settlers.
The Stamp Act was established to gain money, and the Intolerable Acts were established to punish the settlers.
The Stamp Act was forced upon the settlers, and the Intolerable Acts were agreed upon by the settlers.
Most of the people who supported the Stamp Act lived in the New England colonies, while most of the people who supported the Intolerable Acts lived in the Southern colonies.

In 911, a group of vikings lead by rollo besieged paris and chartres. after a victory near chartres on 26 august, charles decided to negotiate with rollo. the talks were led by hervé, the archbishop of reims. this resulted in the treaty of saint-clair-sur-epte, which granted rollo and his soldiers all the land between the river epte and the sea. it also granted him brittany, "for his livelihood". at the time, brittany was an independent land which france had not been able to conquer. in exchange, rollo promised the king his loyalty and military assistance when needed. also rollo also agreed to be baptised and to marry gisela, the king's daughter. the territory given rollo is about the same as upper normandy.