My position is this repeat it will maintain it to my last hour,-taxation and representation are inseparable; this position is founded on the laws of nature, it is more, it is itself an eternal law of
nature, for whatever is a man's own, is absolutely his own; no man has a right to take it from him
without his consent, either expressed by himself or representative; whoever attempts do it,
attempts an injury, whoever does it, commits a robbery, he throws down and destroys the distinction
between liberty and slavery.
-Charles Pratt, 1st Earl Camden, a speech to the British Parliament, 1766

Option: H. An American revolutionary solider.

Explanation:

Charles Pratt, first Baron Camden, was a member of Parliament who spoke against the Acts imposed on colonists. He argued that the colonists had no representatives in Parliament, the British Parliament have no power to put a tax on them to generate revenue. Camden’s argument based on taxation and representation. In England, there can be no taxation without representation, but it is undeniable that  Americans have no representatives British Parliament as being part of their colony.

i just did something on this guy a few days a go give me two minutes to find it in my notes.