Peacemaking criminology is a radical departure from other criminological theories because it focuses on justice and peace. On a micro level, our communities face racial and economic conflicts. On a macro level, we find conflict between states, as well as nations. Do you think that the human race could ever live in peace? Is conflict always bad, or are there any forms of constructive conflict? If some conflict is good, at what point does it turn harmful? Think about the conflicts in your life. Have these conflicts led to injustice? Would “peace” eliminate injustice? Discuss how this change could take place.

The treaty of paris in 1763 returned

Iam told that hundreds if not thousands of these (armenians) were sent at once to the front ranks at the dardanelles, where death in a very short space of time is almost a certainty. the older men were then deported into the interior, while the women and children, when not carried off in an opposite direction, were left to shift for themselves as best they could. the terrible feature of this deportation up to date is that it has been carried out on such a basis as to render it practically impossible in thousands of cases that these families can ever again be reunited. not only wives and husbands, brothers and sisters, but even mothers and their little children have been dispersed in such a manner as to preclude practically all hope that they will ever see each other again. according to this excerpt, what does the author consider to be the worst part of the deportation during the armenian genocide?

Human rights groups in the 20th century worked to: o a. european imperial powers maintain control over their colonies. o b. convince citizens in impoverished countries to embrace nationalism. o o o o c. ensure that people around the world were protected from brutal treatment. o d. weaken the influence of international organizations like the united nations. sub