What does Hamilton mean by "the permanent tenure of judicial offices"? Does Hamilton support or oppose this idea? HELP!

Explanation:

I may not be right but I think he means that permanent tenure recognizes the complexities of the law in a free society and nothing would contribute enough as much as a strong argument. And a few people would have enough knowledge and integrity to judge the law and should be retained because they are adequate to the office, so I think Hamilton supports it but I’m not entirely sure.

for the 2 countries u can do china and america because america has a democratic government while china has a communist government.

a democracy is a government run by the people either by directly voting or indirectly by electing representatives. an oligarchy is a government run by a few or a small group of people. a democracy and oligarchy are similar because both in an oligarchy and an indirect democracy, a small group of induvial determine the laws for a large group of people they are different because in an oligarchy it is easier to control and they do not have to answer to a large number of people in the country, unlike a democracy where they do have to answer to a large number of people an county that is a democracy would be the united states. a country that is an oligarchy would be the china.