Dear Sir, I hope this letter finds you In good health and in a prosperous enough position
To put wealth in the pockets of people like me
Down on their luck
You see, that was my wife who you decided to
uhhh
Uh-oh!
You made the wrong s u c k e r a c u c k hold
So time to pay the piper for the pants you u n b u c k l e d
And hey, you can keep seein' my we wife
If the price is right: if not I'm telling your wife

Answerwho is the first goverment en united state

In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction

Which of these did the soviet union do in 1961? it built a wall through berlin to keep people from moving to the west. it used force to destroy a wall the united states had built in berlin. it convinced the british and french to merge their zones in berlin with the soviet zone. it threatened to bomb berlin if the united states did not leave within 30 days.