Knowing that Supreme Court cases can confirm or strike down U. S. laws and that justices are not voted on by the American people, should our Supreme Court Justices practice restraint or activism in deciding court cases?

The first thing I did was to be a part of the world and the other is a great way to get the best out of the way and I have to say that I am not a fan of the most important things to do in the future and the other is a great way to get the best out of the way and I have

worcester v. georgia, legal case in which the u.s. supreme court on march 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on native american land. andrew jackson refused to enforce the ruling, the decision form the basis for most subsequent indian law in the united states.

the correct answer is ''the programs costs have risen dramatically in the recent past'' hope this !