Explain ONE way in which the Pueblo Revolts differed from the Cossack Revolts.

ONE way in which the Pueblo Revolts differed from the Cossack Revolts is:

While the Pueblo revolts had religious coloration, the Cossacks revolts were political.

Explanation:

The Pueblo Revolts occurred in 1680 and lasted for 12 years only.  They were revolts against the forced conversion of Pueblo Indians to Christianity.  On the other hand, the Cossack revolts were a series of military conflicts engineered by Cossacks against the various (Polish, Lithuanian, and Russian)  states that tried to dominate them in their territories during the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries.   This implies that the Cossacks revolts were politically-inclined, while the Pueblo revolts were mainly religious.

The difference between the Pueblo revolts and the Cossack revolt is that the Pueblos revolted against the forced religion of the Spanish while the Cossack revolt had a political undertone.

The Pueblo revolt was due to the religious persecution that the Pueblos faced in the hands of the Spanish conquistadors.

The Pueblos ended up revolting against them because they wanted them out of their country.

The Cossack rebellion was due to the fact that the Cossacks felt that their social privileges were being threatened. The revolts were crushed but with very great difficulty.

Read more on link

answer: karl marx, max weber, and emile durkheim (the fourth could be considered georg simmel)

explanation:

hello!

according to the passage the most suitable options are two. the first one is "by leading the aef to victory in several key battles" like the battle of saint- mihiel and the battle of cantigny mentioned in the passage you copied here. the second one is "by the aef and allied forces defeat germany" since the passage says that his army destroy the german resistance in the meuse- argonne offensive. and also, "by insisting that the aef operate as an independent force".

hope this