A paragraph about the fall of the Western Roman Empire using your own words please use your own words.

The most clear hypothesis for Western Rome's breakdown nails the tumble to a line of military misfortunes supported against outside powers. Rome had gone head to head with Germanic clans for quite a long time, however by the 300s "barbarian" bunches like the Goths had infringed past the Domain's outskirts. In 476 C.E. Romulus, the remainder of the Roman emperors in the west, was ousted by the Germanic chief Odoacer, who turned into the primary Barbarian to control in Rome. The request that the Roman Domain had brought to western Europe for a very long time was no more. the Germanic chief Odoacer organized a revolt and dismissed the Emperor Romulus Augustulus. From that point on, no Roman emperor could until kingdom come rule from a post in Italy, driving numerous to refer to 476 as the year the Western Domain endured its final knockout. All in all, the Roman domain succumbed to numerous reasons, yet the 5 fundamental ones were attacks by Barbarian clans, Financial difficulties, and overreliance on slave work, Overexpansion and Military Spending, and Government debasement and political unsteadiness.

your welcome :)

yes has peoplewith high ranks that you answer stufff

plzzz give brainlest and me

1) checks and balances- this idea is implemented in the constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. for example, the legislative branch(congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (president). if the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. this check on power ensures that congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.

2) anti-federalists do not want to ratify the constitution unless it includes a bill of rights. the anti-federalists are worried that the constitution gives too much power to the federal government. having a strong central government caused problems when the us was still part of great britain. this is why the anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.

3) federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix america's weak political structure. before the us constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the articles of confederation. this constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.

can't do the whole thing, hope this