If you were a Supreme Court justice , what legal arguments would you take into account in deciding Texas Vs Johnson ? PLS HELP

If you were an Associate Justice serving on the Supreme Court, what legal arguments would you take into account in deciding Texas v. Johnson?

What emotional arguments would you need to be aware of and set aside?

Can you think of other examples of symbolic political speech that might be offensive to some but that would be protected by the First Amendment?

the effect of the ming leaders banning ships with more than two masts was that there was no further construction of ships masts, because there was a surplus. ming emperors disallowed foreign exploration