The driver of a car negligently hits a parked truck and then flees the scene of the accident. The driver of the truck is seriously injured and unable to exit his vehicle, which is leaking fuel as a result of the accident. A passerby stops to help the injured truck driver, at which point the truck explodes and
badly injures the passerby as well as the truck driver. The passerby sues the driver of the car for causing the truck to explode and injure him, even
though he could have avoided injury if he hadn't stopped to help.
Based on this scenario I want you to explain in an essay:
a. IVhat is the tort? Include Duty, Breach, Causation, Damages if it applies.
b. Is this tort a intentional or negliagent tort?
c. If it is intentional which category does it fall under.
d. Which possible defense could be used if any?
e. What do you think the outcome would be. Explain your answer.

"i care deeply about campaign finance reforms: - apex

this is a good question! i'll do some research and come back when i have the answer!

hamas is the terrorist group present in palestine.terrorism has been a feature of life in israel even before the country's establishment in 1948.as per israeli government, 3200 people have died in terrorist attacks.

in january 2007, meshal stated that hamas would consider recognizing israel once a palestinian state was established. a haaretz story noted, "this is the first time that a hamas official has raised the possibility of full and official recognition of israel in the future." according to the story, prime minister ehud olmert "shrugged off" meshal's statement.

in december 2010, hamas announced it would honor any palestinian referendum that approved a peace plan with israel. "we accept a palestinian state on the borders of 1967, with jerusalem as its capital, the release of palestinian prisoners, and the resolution of the issue of refugees," said haniyeh. "hamas will respect the results [of a referendum]," he added, "regardless of whether it differs with its ideology and principles." zvi bar'el, a leading haaretz political analyst, noted: "not a return of refugees, not the destruction of the state of israel, no preconditions.