Someone fix this please (its not mine but I need it to be fixed like grammar wise) The United States shouldn't have declared war against Mexico because it was its land and though not fully explored and populated the regionhad also Native American nations, an alternative buy be to buy or get agreements to explore the regions. A second reason is that it is a clearly example of a stronger nation preying on a weaker one, an atittude which many countries do not accept. Counterargument: It was their right to keep their state and not invade and declare war because of land.

Even though some people think that it was their right to keep the land, one could argue that caudillo-like states, as in South America, could emerge and an elite would totally dominate the poorer on the exploration of the weath.

The United States should not have declared war against Mexico because it was its land and though not fully explored and populated the region had many Native American nations, an alternative solution would be to buy create agreements to explore the regions. Another reason is that a clearly example of a stronger nation preying on a weaker one, an attitude which many countries do not accept.

Counterargument: It was the Native American's right to keep their land and not invade and declare war because of land.

Even though some people think that it was their right to keep the land, one could argue that caudillo-like states, as in South America, could emerge and an elite would totally dominate the poorer on the exploration of the wealth

from the point of view of the king he did nothing wrong because he believes that all property is his property

but to the colonists he is doing wrong because they get no say in the way their own home is used

hope this

the best description of the camp david accords is that it was the first time an arab nation had officially recognized the nation of israel.