Read this paragraph from a student's essay. Long before Flannery O'Connor found success as a writer, she had a
brief brush with fame. As a five-year-old in Georgia, O'Connor had a
chicken that could walk both forward and backward. In her essay "Living
with a Peacock," O'Connor recalls how a photographer from Pathé News
came from New York to Savannah to film her with her chicken. She
describes how the experience influenced her to raise fowl all her life.
1. Choose two of the bolded nouns or noun phrases. Replace
your choices with noun phrases that provide more detail.
These details don't need to be factually accurate--they just
need to be in the form of noun phrases!
2. Identify the function of each noun phrase you added, and
explain how the phrases affect the paragraph.

Which is the best example of a primary source ducument useful in the study of history ?

Ineed with this unit test 1. japan became a peaceful democratic nation relatively quickly after the end of world war 11 which step is not part of it post-war transformation -adopting a new constitution -disarming most of the military -giving women rights to vote -giving the emperor more political power 2. why did mao start the cultural revolution? -he thought government officials had promoted a very narrow view of communism -he wanted to speed up change and eliminate western, capitalist influence-he wanted to speed up the economy by promoting capitalism -he wanted to restore traditional chinese culture 3. what launched the korean war? -general macarthur led an invasion of north korea -north koreans, with stalin's approval, invaded south korea -south koreans tried to capture the government in p'yongyang-chairman mao urged the south koreans to invade north korea

Which statement in the passage best reflects sumer's opinion of the dred scott decision? a."i speak what cannot be denied." b."[the] judgment was sustained by a falsification of history." b."the opinion was more thoroughly abominable than anything history." i speak what cannot be denied when i declare that the opinion of the chief justice in the case of dred scott was more thoroughly abominable than anything of the kind in the history of courts. judicial baseness reached its lowest point on that occasion. you have not forgotten that terrible decision where a most unrighteous judgment was sustained by a falsification of history. -charles sumner, 1865