How is a concurring opinion different from a dissenting opinion? A concurring opinion demands that all justices rule in the same way on a case, while a dissenting opinion explains the differing opinions of justices who ruled the same way on a case.

A concurring opinion explains why a justice disagrees with the majority decision, but abstains from ruling on the case, while a dissenting opinion describes the feelings of the majority.

A concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority.

A concurring opinion asserts that two similar cases should be aligned and ruled on together, while a dissenting opinion insists that the case being heard is singular and unique.

relations between the soviet union and the united states were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. the distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.

the united states government was initially hostile to the soviet leaders for taking russia out of world war i and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. although the united states embarked on a famine relief program in the soviet union in the early 1920s and american businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the new economic policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. by that time, the totalitarian nature of joseph stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the west. although world war ii brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating nazi germany, the soviet union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward eastern europe had created tensions even before the war ended.

sitting in that one chair where he could get shot at was his worst decision.

d. it gave farmers a way to organize for more political power

you want somebody to write an essay for you?