The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police

may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.

Explanation:

The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio and Horton v. California ruled that the police, in certain cases, can search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.

Terry v. Ohio was the case, of which the Supreme Court gave verdict on June 10, 1968, in which the Supreme Court ruled that police can search individuals or seize property without a warrant. In Terry v. Ohio, the case was when a local plice officer suspected Terry and his two accomplice were upto something, possibly robbing of a store, searched them and found them armed with pistols.

And, in Horton v. California case, Seargent LaRault got warrant to search on the property of Horton, who was suspected of robbery, and found criminal weapons used at the time of robbery. Because the warrant only permitted of searching and not seizure of property, the Supreme Court gave verdict that in such cases, police can seize the property without warrant.

So, the correct answer is that the Supreme Court gave verdict that police in some cases can have warrantless individual search and seizure of property.

the correct answers are 1, 2 5, 6

music and prayer? (you may punch me in the face if im wrong : > )