Choose one of the two topics below. Make an argument (or claim) about whether or not the results of the conflict or process benefited or harmed the United States as a whole or specific groups or regions within the United States. Provide AT LEAST TWO pieces of specific evidence or examples to
support your argument.
Mexican-American War
Civil War
Reconstruction
PLEASE ANSWER I WILL DO ANYTHING AND GIVE BRAINLIST PLEASE HELP

Which statement is true regarding the government structures of new france and the english colonies? a. new france was governed by the king, while some english colonies had authority to govern themselves. b. new france and the english colonies were established with the understanding that the king or queen would oversee all aspects of society. c. the english colonies were ruled by the king or queen who granted the charters, while new france had complete autonomy. d. both new france and the english colonies ruled without any interference from their country's respective king or queen.

Did the spanish settlers and missions have a positive effect on world history? why, what did they do that was positive? why was the treaty of paris (1763) good for the world/world history? did the plymouth colony have a positive effect on world history? why, what did they do that was positive?

Why did reagan have the united stars invade grenada